domingo, 17 de julho de 2016

Teresa Cristina of Bourbon and Two Siciles: The Last Empress of Brazil (1822-1889)









                                       


Before Queen Victoria was regarded as the grandmother of Europe in the late 19th century because of the marriage of her children to the noblest houses that ruled the continent, there was the Holy Roman Empress Maria Theresa of Habsburg, whom we have already discussed in a previous post on this blog, whose children led her to be just as related as the British Queen to the rest of the world.

However, whilst historiography usually tends to look upon Portugal, Spain, England and France, not often it turns to other empires, especially the one that is not found amongst the north, but rather in the south. From a Portuguese colony turning to United Kingdom of Portugal, Brazil was, at first, just the destiny where the royal family settled in 1808 with the aid of the British navy to escape the forces of Napoléon. But, with the independence declared by the Portuguese king's son, Pedro, in 1822, the history of Brazilian's royal family was very little discussed.

Pedro of Braganza later known as Emperor Pedro I of Brazil and, with the death of his father, briefly king of Portugal as Pedro IV, was married to the great-niece of Marie Antoinette, named Maria Leopoldina. It was thanks to this particular Habsburg that the independence of Brazil happened. Despite this, their marriage was not so happy, even though they managed to produce seven children, of whom only four survived childhood. Of these four, one was a boy who, after a political crisis, was later crowned as Emperor Pedro II.

Nevertheless, it is not this formidable emperor the subject of the discussion on this blog today but rather his wife, the barely mentioned at all Empress Teresa Cristina. Who was this woman? Why is she ignored in Italy's history or very little written in Brazil? Why is there almost no source about her to rely on? The first biography of hers is yet to be released and was written by a Italian historian. Just as much as there might be characters like her hidden throughout Europe's records of its diverses monarchies, one here is to be spoken today who ruled an empire found in the tropics.

For a start, Teresa Cristina was born in Naples on the 14th day of March of 1822, in the realm of Two-Siciles when her father was firstly duke of Calabria before rising as king Francis I, into the house of Bourbon-Two Siciles, an Italian brench of the Spanish house of Bourbon which descends directly from Louis XIV of France through his grandson Philippe V of Spain. Baptized as Theresa Cristina Maria Giuseppa Gaspare Baltassare Melchiore Gennara Francesca de Padova Donata Bonosa Andrea d'Avelino Rita Luitgarda Geltruda Venancia Taddea Spiridione Rocca Matilde, she was the the youngest daughter of 13 children of King Francis I and his consort, Maria Isabella of Spain, who, in turn, was a younger sister of Carlota Joaquina, Queen of Portugal and grandmother of Teresa's future husband.

About her childhood, it is said that, after the death of her father and the remarriage of her mother, Teresa was neglected by her and was raised in the court of her brother, where historians supposed to be a place of extreme religious, conservative and reactionary based on the formation of Teresa's timid character, as said below:

"It was long believed by historians that the Princess was raised in an ultra-conservative, intolerant atmosphere which resulted in a timid and unassertive character in public and an ability to be contented with very little materially or emotionally. Recent studies revealed a more complex character, who despite having respected the social norms of the era, was able to assert a limited independence due to her strongly opinionated personality as well as her interest in learning, sciences and culture."

By the time the Emperor of Brazil sought a wife, the brazilian embassy went to look for proper bride around the courts of Europe. However, the bad fame of Pedro II's father for being a man of many lovers was well known and it was feared the emperor could inherite such behaviour, so it was not until it was suggested a marriage of Teresa that the match would carry forward. A portrayal of Teresa, which was painted to beautify her common features, was thus ordered. Captured by the beauty seen, Pedro II soon accepted the suggestion of marrying Teresa. And so:

"A proxy wedding was held on 30 May 1843 in Naples, Pedro II being represented by his fiancee's brother Prince Leopold, Count of Syracuse. A small Brazilian fleet composed of a frigate and two corvettes departed for the Two Sicilies on 3 March 1843 to escort the new Empress of Brazil. She arrived on Rio de Janeiro on 3 September 1843. Pedro II immediately rushed to board the ship and greet his bride. Upon seeing this impetuous gesture, the crowds cheered and guns fired deafening salutes. Teresa Cristina fell in love with her new husband at first sight."

Yet, if it was pleasing for the Sicilian princess the sight of that Brazilian monarch with Habsburg features, the same cannot be said of him. It is reported that he did not find her as beautiful as the portrait he received, as we can perceive in the next paragraph:

"His first impressions were only of her physical flaws--and of how much her appearance differed from the portrait which had been sent to him. Physically, she had dark brown hair and brown eyes, was short, slightly overweight, walked with a pronounced limp and, while not ugly, neither was she pretty. According to historian Pedro Calmon, Teresa Cristina had no true limp, but her odd way of walking was instead the result of bowed legs causing her lean alternately right and left as she walked. Pedro II's high expectations were crushed, and he allowed his feelings of revulsion and rejection to show. After a short interval, he left the ship. Perceiving his disillusionment, she burst into tears, lamenting that "the emperor did not like me!"".

Despite the difficult beginning, however, with time they grew fond of each other. Pedro started to appreciate her good nature, despite the differences in their personalities, for upon she began to give him children, which apparently showed a certain effort of both parties in what can be said about their sexual lives (Teresa got pregnant four times each year that has passed: 1845, 1846, 1847 and 1848), she was thus involved in the routine of Pedro's life. They had four children: Afonso, Isabel, Leopoldina and Pedro, but only the girls survived childhood.

And although the relationship with the emperor had improved considerably, though never having been one of love and passion, Teresa was forced to deal with a rival that she feared she could have had her place taken. This rival was not scandalous as was the Marchioness of Santos, but was no less troublemaker in this kind of sense. Her name was Luisa de Barros, known for being the Countess of Barral. As we can observe here:

"Barral possessed all the traits that Pedro II most admired in a woman: she was charming, vivacious, elegant, sophisticated, educated and confident. Charged with the education and upbringing of the young princesses, Barral soon captured the hearts of both Pedro II and his eldest daughter, Isabel. Leopoldina was not won over and disliked the Countess. Althoug Barral "may not have escaped Pedro II's embraces", she "certainly avoided his bed". Nonetheless, (...) the Countess's increasing intimacy with her husband and daughter was painful and vexing to Teresa Cristina. Although she feigned ignorance of the situation, it did not pass unnoticed. She wrote in her diary that Barral "wished to make me tell her that I did not like her, but I did not say either yes or no". Historian Tobias Monteiro wrote that the Empress "could not disguise that she detested Barral"."

As in matters of personality, the Empress was well liked by all, and her friends were limited to her ladies-in-waiting, especially Dona Josefina da Fonseca Costa. But "the long-held view is that the Empress accepted the circumscribed role in which she found herself, and that her life, duty and purpose were tied to her position as the Emperor's wife. However, her personal letters reveal that she could be strongheaded, sometimes at odds with her husband, and had a life of her own--albeit somewhat restricted. In a letter written on 2 May 1845 she stated: "I wait for the moment when we will meet, good Pedro, and seek forgiveness for all that I did to you during these days". In another letter of 24 January 1851, she acknowledged her difficult temperament: "I am not irritated at you [Pedro II] and you should forgive me because this is my character"."

She did not, though, lack any traits of intelectuality. She loved music, arts and, above all, archeology. The Empress, for example, "began assembling a collection of archaelogical artifacts from her earliest days in Brazil, and she exchanged hundreds of others with her brother, King Don Ferdinando II (Ferdinand II)." She also "sponsored archaelogical studies in Italy and many of the artifacts- dated from the Etruscan civilization and the Ancient Roman period- found were brought to Brazil, (...) aided in recruiting Italian physicians, engineers, professors, pharmacists, nurses, artists, artisans and qualified workers with the goal of improving public education and public health in Brazil."

Teresa was also often the companion whenever the emperor travelled to Europe, especially after the death of Leopoldina from typhoid fever, where she went to Coburg to visit her grandchildren. However, upon visiting her homeland, which was annexed to the kingdom of Italy, an unification that happened in 1861, she wrote in 1872 that: "I do not know how to tell what was the impression I had upon seeing again, after 28 years, my fatherland and not find anyone for whom I cared." She much preferred her quiet life in Brazil, where she was found reading, sewing, working in charity, amongst other duties she performed as Empress. 

In 1889, Brazil's politics suffered an important twist: leaded by an army, the militaries deposed the Emperor, forcing him and the royal family to flee in exile. Upon being told to have resignation after receiving the order to leave, she said: "I have it always, but how not to weep having to leave this land forever!". And "according to historian Roderick J.Barman, the "events of November 15, 1889, broke her emotionally and physically" for the Empress "loved Brazil and its inhabitants. She desired nothing more than to end her days there." Having been ill during almost the entire voyage across the Atlantic, Teresa Cristina and her family arrived in Lisbon, Portugal on 7 December."

In her last hours, she claimed that it was not sickness that was killing her, but being sent away from a home she had adopted and lived as if she was born in it. The 'quiet Empress', as she was remembered for, died then on 28 December that year, three days later after being told the Emperor and herself were forbidden to ever go back to Brazil. 

The death of the woman who much did to improve the culture, the manifestation of the Brazilian arts and mostly with her concern she had displayed with public education, was grieved by all brazilians, even those who committed the coup d'état. Like her mother-in-law before her, Teresa Cristina left an impact in the empire of the tropics, something historiography should well approach in future. Furthemore, based on the little things we have found, we can state that she was much more than a woman tied by the social conventions of the 19th century, but one who used her 'silence' to work where others did not. It is only but fair to say that she was rewarded with a proper reburial in 1939 at the Cathedral of Petropolis, in Rio de Janeiro, where she can be found nowadays.

Sources:

http://alchetron.com/Teresa-Cristina-of-the-Two-Sicilies-1147436-W

http://www.open.edu/openlearn/whats-on/events/openlearn-live-12th-july-2016

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teresa_Cristina_of_the_Two_Sicilies




  


















terça-feira, 12 de julho de 2016

Henry Stuart: The King Who Never Was (1594-1612)







It is not rare in History to observe that presumed heirs to determined realms did not take the crown. Death took them away with no warning, leaving the monarchs to look upon their second children and afterwards what most historians come to wonder that is: what would have happened had such heirs lived instead? Would the course of certain historical events be different? What would have changed?

Henry Stuart was one of these heirs who did not live long enough to be crowned the king his father expected him to be. Instead, the crown passed to his younger brother, the duke of York Charles who reigned as King Charles I. It is not often that comparisons between the two brothers are made, especially considering the fiasco that was Charles' reign, marked by conflicts that resulted in the loss of his head, the exile of his family and a brief experience with republicanism under the command of Oliver Cromwell. No wonder then why people ask themselves if the history of Britain would have changed had Henry lived longer, but it seems every course is meant to be, for good or worse.

Born Henry Frederick Stuart on the 19th day of February, 1592, at the Stirling Castle, Scotland, he was the first child of the King of Scots James VI and his consort, Queen Anne of Denmark. Upon his birth, he received the titles of Duke of Rothesay, Earl of Carrick, Baron of Renfrew, Lord of the Isles and Prince and Great Steward of Scotland. Placed under the care of the Earl of Mar, a decision King James did for fearing the Catholic ideas of Queen Anne would influence their son, which might be the reason for their later strangement, Henry was instructed to have a Protestant and proper education for the heir of the King.

In 1603, upon the death of Queen Elizabeth of England, the English crown was inherited by the Scottish monarch and it would not be until 1610 that Henry were to be acknowledged as Prince of Wales; before he was best adressed as Duke of Rothesay. It's also said that the young prince's household was directed to follow a College rather than court, with James VI/I always writing academic texts to his children, "as Sir Thomas Chaloner wrote in 1607, 'Hiss Highness household [...] was intended by the King for a courtly college or a collegiate court"."

Other habits of Henry Frederick included hawking, hunting, jousting, swimming, fencing, and above all, tennis. As said below:

"He loved tilting and swimming, and (...) tennis. (This was the old game called Royal Tennis). He often played for three or four hours non-stop."

Henry also "from a young age studied naval and military affairs and national issues, about which he often disagreed with his father." As he developed his character, one shaped to a pious man, attracted to the Puritan ideas, of serious semblance and reserved nature, the prince of Wales' popularity grew to the point to surpass his own father's: he was thus the embodiment of the hopes of many Protestants due to his religious nature. This being said, differences with the king in conduct and politics can be explained, for he "disapproved of the way his father conducted the royal court, disliked Robert Carr, a favourite of his father, and esteemed Sir Walter Raleigh, wishing him to be released from the Tower of London." In addition, he's presumably said "Only my father would keep such a bird in such a cage." And it's with no surprise to note that whilst King James lived at Whitehall Palace, Prince Henry lived at St James's Palace, where he picked intelectual courtiers at court, and apparently he fined them if they were seen swearing.

If his relationship with his father was quite tense, with reports of public arguments, the same cannot be said of the relationship he had with his sister. Princess Elizabeth, whom we have already discussed on this blog, and him were always attached to one another. When they were living in different households in Scotland, the children would exchange letters with Henry writing in Latin and Elizabeth, to please her dearest brother, in Italian. We can better perceive their closeness below:

"Prince Harry had a close personal relationship with his sister Princess Elisabeth, who was two years younger. At times they lived in the same household at Nonsuch. When she was residing at Coombe Abbey near Coventry, he missed her company and wrote to her regularly."

When she came of age in marrying, it was her brother who chose her betrothed, the Protestant Elector Palatinate Frederick. The two young men became friends and it was reported that, even after his death, Elizabeth was married to Frederick not only because she eventually grew to love her betrothed but because she wished to obey her brother's wishes. Naturally, Henry Stuart left his mark in his sister: when she was elected Queen of Bohemia, she was the Protestant symbol of Europe, fighting away the Catholics, something Henry would do had he lived, considering his strong anti-Catholic views.

As for the younger brother, Charles, despite it being said the two princes barely got along at all, this can be argued not only by the difference of their ages and the fact they lived in different households, but because "they maintained a brotherly correspondence, much of it in Latin, and none which suggests anything but a normal and affectionate relationship of brothers. When Henry Frederick fell ill in the auturmn of 1612, Charles took him a miniature gold sculptured horse which had been given him by one of the Medici relatives of the French consort, an item Charles treasured." And also, the most famous portrait of the Stuart prince was later comissioned by Charles as King.

Surprisingly, he had a good relationship with the French king, Henry IV, the leader of the Huguenotes who ended up converting to Catholicism to settle the War of Religions. It is possible to assume that, considering the constant conflicts a normal teenager boy had with his father back then, he saw Henry IV as an idealistic father he did not have. Nonetheless, le bon roi Henry "sent his young friend some highly prized specimens to add to his stable."

As stated before, the character of the young prince was shaped as an idealistic Protestant would be, though difficultly compared to the boy king Edward Tudor. Henry openly criticized his mother's sympathies for Catholicism, the Papist teachings of his brother Charles and the Catholic tomb of his grandmother, Mary, Queen of Scots, for apparently it would be an "endorsment of her Catholic faith, and he refused to permit his father to negotiate a marriage for him with a French or Spanish Catholic princess stating there would only be one religion in his marriage bed."

Despite this religious militance and the strictness of his personality, Henry was an admirer and a patron of arts; he also "commissioned explorers to investigate the Northwest Passage. He built libraries and a picture gallery for the works by Hilliard and Holbein (...) He was intent on constructing the first bridge across the Thames at Westminster when he died."

It was hardly predictable that such a handsome and popular prince, who had outlived childhood, died in his 18 years. The illness was likely to have been typhoid fever, and the symptons apparently came before with the constant headaches, sore throats, that got worse after playing tennis, but who knew those were the symptons that would take him away? On the 6th day of November, 1612, Henry Frederick Stuart departed this world, leaving two kingdoms and a family mourning deeply for him, for the king he never would be and the person he would be missed.


Sources:


http://www.luminarium.org/encyclopedia/princehenry.htm

http://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/periods/stuarts/death-prince-henry-and-succession-crisis-1612-1614

http://www.historytoday.com/roy-strong/henry-prince-wales-englands-lost-stuart-king

http://www.westminster-abbey.org/our-history/royals/henry-frederick,-prince-of-wales

http://www.npg.org.uk/business/publications/the-lost-prince-henry-prince-of-wales-1594-1612.php

http://englishhistoryauthors.blogspot.com.br/2015/02/the-children-of-englands-first-stuart.html

http://thepeerage.com/p10138.htm

http://www.standard.co.uk/goingout/exhibitions/the-lost-prince-the-life-and-death-of-henry-stuart-national-portrait-gallery-wc2-review-8389565.html

http://www.lookandlearn.com/blog/26679/henry-stuart-prince-of-wales-would-have-been-henry-ix-had-he-lived/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Frederick,_Prince_of_Wales

https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2012/oct/21/lost-prince-henry-stuart-review
























sexta-feira, 8 de julho de 2016

Adhélaide d'Aquitaine: The Half-Viking Princess Who Became The First Queen Consort of France. (950/952-1004)







Adhélaide of Aquitaine (sometimes spelled: Adélaide d'Aquitaine, Adhélaide of Poitiers, Adelais de Poitou) was regarded as the first consort of a dynasty that ruled in France from the tenth century to the fourteenth century, known by the name of Capet. 

The day of her birth was not recorded, with some sources claiming the year being between 950 and 952. Adhélaide was the daughter of Adèle of Normandy and William III, Duke of Aquitaine. Her mother was the daughter of Rollo, an infamous Viking who founded Normandy and, to be in peace with the King of Franks, converted to Christianism and was married to a noble daughter, possibly the daughter of a Count who was captured by Rollo when he took the man's lands. Named Gerloc, she later received the name Adèle and was married to William before he rose as Count of Poitou and Duke of Aquitaine. Little is known about her.

It is, admitedly, difficult to find further sources about what many consider her to be the first Queen consort of France. What is known about this woman is that her father, the Duke of Aquitaine, made a truce with Hugh Capet and so  Adhélaide was married to him around 969. And around the year of 987, when the last king of the Carolingean line came to die, Hugh Capet was elected as King of Franks next to his consort, Adhélaide. Also, "they were proclaimed at Senlis and blessed at Noyon. They were the founders of the Capetian dynasty of France."

They had three children: Hedwig, Countess of Mons; Robert II, whose granddaughter Mathilde was later married to William the Conqueror of England; and Gisèle, Countess of Ponthieu. A source or two list other daughters, but they cannot be confirmed for certain.

Upon the death of her husband, in 996, she was apparently left regent until the majority of their son, Robert. Adhélaide herself then died in 1004 and it is said she is found buried in Monastere de St-Frambault, in France.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adelaide_of_Aquitaine

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad%C3%A8le_of_France,_Countess_of_Flanders

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerloc

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poppa_of_Bayeux

https://www.genealogieonline.nl/en/stamboom-homs/I5411162182100027072.php

https://www.geni.com/people/Ad%C3%A9la%C3%AFde-d-Aquitaine-reine-des-Francs/5411162182100027072

http://www.examiner.com/article/historical-profile-adelaide-of-aquitaine

http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=122680964

http://www.robertsewell.ca/normandy.html

http://www.robertsewell.ca/capet.html#gen11

http://family.beacondeacon.com/capet.htm